<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peaks and Troughs part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/</link>
	<description>Wildlife, Tracking and Bushcraft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Billy,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You&#039;ve got me wondering now. I&#039;ll have to do some local research.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Pablo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got me wondering now. I&#8217;ll have to do some local research.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Pablo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodlife.co.uk/2007/08/28/peaks-and-troughs-part-1/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Are you sure that Broak isn&#039;t a corruption of Brock from the Old English Broc = Brook&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Brock is often regarded as an old word for badger but seems to need to have been spelt Brocc in early documents for it not to just mean brook.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sorry to ask but i am interested in etymology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that Broak isn&#8217;t a corruption of Brock from the Old English Broc = Brook</p>
<p>Brock is often regarded as an old word for badger but seems to need to have been spelt Brocc in early documents for it not to just mean brook.</p>
<p>Sorry to ask but i am interested in etymology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

