Colours and Camo

By Pablo | Posted in clothing
November 14th, 2007

I’ve been looking at this subject quite closely, especially since returning from the tracking course. In days gone by when the word ‘Bushcraft’ was virtually unknown; Ray was a mere (!) youngster; Goretex had not yet been integrated into almost all outdoor products and the mobile telephone was the size of a small country, Pablo was running about the woods in full camo.

Along came Michael Ryan and suddenly camo went rapidly out of fashion. So for that matter did anything to do with survivalism and big knives. Even though he carried out the killings dressed in black, all the papers showed him wearning camo clothing and described him as a survivalist. The stigma was set. This therefore contributed (but not solely responsible) for putting paid to Pablo’s outdoor adventures at that time.

My return to Bushcraft saw me scowl at my damp and mouldy camo equipment and clothes, and most of it went in the bin. I shunned anything to do with British army Disruptive Pattern Material (DPM) seeing it as an unnecessary return to the survivalist ‘uniform’, even though urban wear was bringing camo styles back “in”. For me, though, olive green or brown was the new camo. But why those colours?

Animals can on the whole, only see two colours, but on the tracking course I learnt that (surprisingly) birds and some insects can see colour. Not blending in may send out alarm calls tipping off the mammals like a ripple effect. A thread on BCUK has some well informed (and some not so well informed) statements and facts about exactly what colours wildlife can and can’t see. Okay, so I’ll stick to earth colours, but what about camo?

Khaki is Urdu for “dusty” and it was that colour that the British Military in India dyed their clothes in the 1850’s starting the move from bright tunics to the first form of camouflage. This was because of the sudden increase in casualties and change to more guerrilla style warfare. Other countries soon followed suit (if you pardon the pun).

I was quite surprised to see many of the tracking instructors in camo. Although I didn’t ask, I kind of gathered it was better for tracking, stalking and keeping concealed although I knew that camo pattern in modern clothing was really designed for keeping persons concealed from other persons (if you see what I mean).

So here’s the debate. To camo or not to camo….that is the question. Herewith, I issue my first bushcraft edict…and Pablo says (with apologies to Mungo):

For tracking purposes, earth type colours are better than bright colours (especially blue) as some insects and birds can see in colour and some animals can even see ‘end of spectrum colours’ (ultra-violet) thus possibly warning mammals of something present outside of the baseline.

There isn’t much in nature (if anything) that has a ‘block’ of colour even if it is an earth colour therefore a disruptive pattern can only be better for remaining undetected to wildlife.

Modern camo styles and material was really designed for concealing people from people, therefore it doesn’t really matter what ‘type’ or ‘style’ of camo you have (if you’re not hiding from people that is) as long as it’s disruptive and it roughly blends into the baseline. Extremes e.g. snow camo for woodland might not be suitable. (Flektarn.co.uk is a great site for comparing camo styles by the way.)

Additionally…

If you’re clattering about doing bushcrafty things, for example hammering, making stuff and cooking, there’s no real reason to wear earth colours because wildlife won’t come near you anyway (unless they take a fancy to your grub.)

Another consideration is that earth colours hide the dirt more effectively. More washing equals more detergent equals more ultra violet and more human made scent. (The pic shows what a deer would see on a freshly washed garment).

A lot of robust (and cheap) kit and clothing (with a few exceptions of course) will come from surplus military sources, so it will be camo, olive green or brown in any case.

For wildlife watching or tracking it’s worth bearing in mind that shiny clothes will attract attention (‘fuzz-up’ by rolling in the dust or mud), so will shape (add foliage or throw over a cam net to break up the outline), smell (de-scent over a fire) and of course movement (err…keep still!)

I dislike too much British army DPM, probably because I spent 12 years wearing the stuff but it wouldn’t stop me buying DPM if there was no other colour alternative.

Carry something bright to wear. You might come across the odd farmer with a gun, a rough shooter or even a poacher. It might look a bit stupid having an orange Thermarest stuff sack on your head, but it saves an @ full of lead shot!

In case you’re wondering, this post has given me reasoned arguments in order to justify the purchase of a new camo jacket!!

Pablo.

Tags:

8 Responses to "Colours and Camo"

  1. Jon says:

    HI Pablo

    The British Army type-DPM camo gear is used primarily because it is cheap! Other types of camo, like my flecktarn, I think do a better job of disrupting your outline at a good price, than the standard DPM. Flecktarn is very similar to modern digital camo.

    On the whole though, muted colours are helpful because, even though it may not make a difference to animals, it does to people which can have an impact on your wildlife watching!

  2. Hawkeye The Noo says:

    Hi Pablo, don’t forget wool camo, i.e King of the mountain or sleeping indian. They are expensive but i just noticed that Columbia do a new wool camo range called gelatin which is less than half the cost of the other two.

    wool is quiet and haa a lower uv detectability and it is mat and also woven in. Just something to think about. For me it was close to the same cost as a walkers game ear but I would get a lot more use from it so wool camo one the debate for me.

  3. Pablo says:

    Jon & Hawkeye,

    Thanks for the input.

    Two tracking experts there folks.

    Cheers,

    Pablo.

  4. John Roy says:

    found a great site
    http://www.camotest.de/

    all words in german, bt you can look at many different cam’ from around the world nd compare effectiveness

  5. Linda says:

    It’s a shame that the actions of a few puts a stigma on the many. I like cammo myself. I did know that birds see way more colors than humans do, and that was important for me to know as a birder.

    So I have recently started using more cammo clothes when I am out in the field. But rather than using military cammo, I have been using hunter’s cammo that matches the terrain of my primary birding areas, which is mostly oak woodland here in Southern California. Additinally, my Maxpedition Sitka Gearslinger is dark green and all of my accessories are olive drab.

    My understanding of cammo is that one of the primary objectives is visual pattern interupt; if you don’t present a standard outline, you won’t be seen. So I tried an experiment.

    I wore my former clothing on an outing and took some new cammo items with me (shirt and hat). My usual garb was a blue zip top under a black fleece jacket, blue jeans, and a black fleece cap or tan Tilley sun hat. Then I paid attention to how close I could get to the birds and also did some staionary sits.

    The bottom line was that I got closer and the birds came closer when I was sitting when I had the cammo gear on. I get some weird looks from some of my fellow birders when I wear the hunting cammo, but I sure don’t let it deter me from wearing it now that I know it works!

    Cheers,
    Linda

  6. Pablo says:

    Interesting experiment Linda. Worthy of consideration for others.

  7. Andrew Daniels says:

    Hi. I’m interested in the “UV” photo of the garment earlier on. Would I be correct in thinking that this was taken with a standard camera, whilst illuminating the garment with a “UV” light?

    If we’re talking about washing garments, I would suggest this theory: standard washing powders contain substances called optical brightening agents (OBAs), which absorb UV light and re-emit light in the spectrum which is visible to us humans. This results in the classic “white shirt in the disco” effect. However, “colour-care” washing powders do not contain OBAs, as they can effect colour perception. So… if you only ever wash your camo gear in “colour-care” powder (or liquid), the “UV glow” effect should gradually fade over time.

    Hopefully, I’ve understood the points made above – I worked as a development chemist in a detergent powder factory for 6 years.

    By the way… I hate British DPM, but I LOVE Flecktarn!

    All the best to one and all.
    Andrew

  8. Pablo says:

    Andrew,
    Many thanks for your comment. Interesting observation about the “colour-care” detergent. I will certainly remember that. The UV photo was a standard camera with UV light.

Leave a Reply

Woodlife News

Next Hatfield Course

Woodlife Trails

The next Countryside and Woodland Awareness Course at Hatfield Forest with places still available is Sun 11th March.

Bushcraft Magazine

Bushcraft Mag

Pablo's article The Urban Fox is the cover article in this month's Bushcraft and Survival Mag available from 23 December.

Courses Slideshow

Jp's Twitter

Archives

Woodlife Trails Ltd

Woodlife Trails

Registered in England and Wales at Companies House.

Company Registration Number: 7931032

Registered Office:

Headley House, 16A Orsett Road, Grays Essex, RM17 5DL

info@woodlife.co.uk

Search

About us

About UsWelcome. This is the home of Woodlife. You will find links to Pablos Woodlife (blog) the Woodlife Social Network (forum) and Woodlife Trails (courses) all on this page.
Theme Tweaker by Unreal