Snugpak Stratosphere hooped bivi bag – Initial Review
kit, reviews April 3rd, 2008It would be easy to make this a hammock versus bivi bag review, but really these are two different ways of sleeping in the outdoors. So I’ll attempt to confine this to reviewing the bivi bag itself.
As the name implies, a bivi bag is designed as a shelter and to encompass a sleeping bag which will lay straight on the ground. Ideally it should protect the sleeping bag from the rising damp of the ground and be waterproof enough to protect the occupant from the elements. Basically it’s a single person lightweight shelter falling short of an actual tent.
There are a few bivi bags around but the most popular is the ex-Brit army goretex version; a bag I have used on a number of previous occasions. These are certainly waterproof but you pay for it in weight. The other disadvantage is that most bivi bags leave the head exposed. So is the Snagpak bivi bag an improvement on this system?
The bivi bag comes in its own compression stuff sack, which is a good start. There are two lightweight alluminium poles which collapse into 8 inch lengths. There’s also a bag of the sturdiest tent pegs I’ve ever seen (and the heaviest!) They went straight into the great tent peg repository in the sky to be replaced by my normal alluminium pegs.
Setting up the bag couln’t be easier. Thread the poles through the sleeves at the head end of the bag and secure the ends in the holes in the loops provided (a la tent). These loops can then be pegged down. Before you ask, yes it is necessary to peg at least two poles down (one at each side) or the hood part moves about too much and becomes a pain.
It’s also a good idea to peg out the other foot end of the bag with one peg in the provided loop. This make a minimum of three extra pegs you must carry about (or make).
The obvious difference between this and a normal bivi bag is that you now have a raised, supported or framed hood at the head end, which you can only really appreciate once you’re inside the bag. It’s really a self supporting canopy, which can be enclosed, covering your head and shoulders.
Unless you have a very large head there’s surprisingly a lot of space in this area and you can share this space with a couple of small items that you might want to keep dry. I put my hygiene pack in there, spare socks, and Swanni shirt. You certainly have no room to cook (that would be a little dangerous as well) but there’s space enough inside to read a book, nibble on some trail food and listen to the rain.
There’s a nice little touch inside of the roof of the hood where Snugpak have sewn in a piece of zipped, square, white netting. This is ideal for storing your head torch, providing your light and for stroing any loose items from your pockets.
The other mesh vent is at the front of the face if you were laying face up in the bag. Left unattended it would just dangle down in at about chest level, but you have the option of rolling it up or zipping it to the outer material of the bivi bag. This second option encloses you completely yet allows a good deal of ventilation through the hood. I slept like this most of the weekend and there was no sign of condensation in the bag at all.
The alternative to zipping the netting up is to completely zip up and enclose the front or top of the bag in the outer material. I found this very clausterphobic, but if you are used to small tents, it’s probably no worse than that. What it does do is completely keep out wind and rain. It also very quickly increases the temperature inside the bag and as long as the end vent is fully open, there doesn’t seem to be a great deal of condensation as a result of this operation, but I didn’t try this out for long.
The material fabric top is 40D Nylon Ripstop, which is waterproof and moisture permeable: The bottom fabric is 70D Nylon Taffeta with PU Coating. Here are the sizes:
Size: 230 x 95 x 60cm
Pack Size: 35 x 10 x 15cm
Weight: 1300g / 1.3KG
The size of the bag isn’t a great issue and should be long enough to fit most folk. Width may be a problem for larger people and Unlike the ex-military bivi bag which has ample space inside, I’m not sure whether you would be able to stuff a large rucksack at the bottom of the bag in order to keep it dry. Perhaps a small one.
I haven’t tested fully how waterproof the whole bag is, as on my intial excursion with the Stratosphere, I also had a tarp, but I can say that the damp ground didn’t ingress into the bottom of the bag at all. I’m not sure whether it would stand up to a full onslaught when open to the elements, but other reviewers have stated that they had no problems even in foul weather on open ground.
The nearest rival to this bag has is the Highlander Falcon, which is similarly styled. They’re about the same price and roughly made out of the same material. The Falcon though has the vent at the top of the hood.
The Stratosphere ranges between £75-£90 (March 2008 prices).
All in all I’m quite impressed with the bag as a ground dwelling shelter. It will keep damp off and certainly makes for a cosy and warm environment once you’re inside the bag. It is a litle vision restrictive – but then, I suppose you don’t have to deploy the hood.
In summer it will keep the mossies and midges at bay while providing good ventilation and you should be able to use it without tarp. Add a Thermarest and you should have a relatively comfortable nights kip (if you’re a ground-dwelling that is).
Pablo.






March 29th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Very informative so thanks but if you were scoring this on a scale of 1-10 what would the overall score be? and would you say this item is good value for money? Many Thanks Tony
March 29th, 2009 at 9:20 am
I think I would give it a 7/10. I would spend the same money again and get another one if I lost it for example.
March 29th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
Many thanks again Pablo, I think that the Snugpak will be my next purchase along with a Alpkit down bag, hopefully I will be able to get a discount for multiple items as the rest of my family may be persuaded to “go down the same path” as it were! BTW what a great site,I should have dropped in earlier!
March 29th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Tony – This is a good choice. The Snugpak is light enough to carry around to keep the damp off a down bag. Consider a zip on the right for your down bag because the Stratosphere has a zip on the right. All the best. Pablo.
November 25th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Thanks for the review Pablo. This sounds like a better option than my tent.
I read another review at http://www.snugpak.com/forum/showthread.php?p=41 where the reviewer suggested that the whole bag could be rolled up with the mat and the sleeping bag still inside. Does that seem like a feasible option to you or would the package be too big for the back of a bike? This would save some trouble when I’m out cycling and just want to crash for the night.
December 13th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
Thanks for the review pablo, very informative ..Bob
December 27th, 2009 at 12:16 am
Can you confirm that this is really either 37 or 42 inches tall. It seems pretty high.
December 27th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
Dave,
These are the sizes:
Size: 230 x 95 x 60cm
Pack Size: 35 x 10 x 15cm
Weight: 1300g / 1.3KG
January 27th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
Very good review. I am thinking of buying one.
I would like to ask you if it can withstand severe weather temperature, i.e. -20 degrees Celsius, or not?
Greetings from Greece.
January 29th, 2010 at 9:07 am
Thanks Nassos. I don;t think it would be suitable for -20. The material is quite thin. You would need a lot of insulation.
February 1st, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Thank you for the review. Have you had a chance to test the bag in warm-hot weather? With warm-hot weather, I mean temps in the 80-100 degree fahrenheit range. What I would like to know is, how breathable the bag is towards your legs and feet? While camping in warm-hot weather, did it feel like your body heat was building up inside the bivy?
February 1st, 2010 at 8:39 pm
Hi Kevin, No not that hot. I have tried it in the UK summer with a night temperature of about 50F. The material is quite breathable and there was no sticking. There was very little condensation as long as you keep the vents open. I just found it a little clausterphobic with all the zips done up.
April 22nd, 2010 at 10:14 am
Hi Pablo, Thanks for the excellent reviews and website. I’m thoroughly enjoying the read and information
) I’m currently stuck on choosing between the Snugpak Stratosphere and the Falcon. I like the rear vent on the Stratosphere but like the way the bottom of the Falcon pegs out. I was wondering if this would keep me dryer if it was very wet as it suspends the bivi up a bit from what I can see. The Falcon is advertised as being strong too. Is the material of the Stratosphere strong? Oh, and it’s cheaper. What do you think? Is there much difference between the two?
Oh, and would you use something as a groundsheet for these?
)
Many thanks
April 22nd, 2010 at 11:27 am
Hi Julia, Thanks for the comments. To be honest, I wouldn;t trust either in a torrential downpour, but both are ok for light rain as they both have similar material. It wouldn;t matter that the Falcon pegs out higher. It’s not that effective one you’re inside (my mates got one). No need for a ground sheet as long as you have a sleep mat. It boils down to vent at the rear or on top. You will need a through draft because of the condensation. I chose the Snugpack because I wanted to see out. Hope this helps.
April 23rd, 2010 at 10:51 am
Thanks Pablo. That helps a lot as I like the idea of being able to see out as well
I’ll look at getting a tarp as well for rainy weather and possibly a DD Travel hammock too. The hammock sounds really comfy but I have a bad back so not sure it’s a good option. Unfortunately I won’t know until I try it! Thanks for helping me choose. Apparently the Snugpak Stratosphere is undergoing some improvements and is apparently going to be a bit lighter! Hopefully it’ll still be as strong. I can’t wait to get one and try it out!
June 2nd, 2010 at 7:20 pm
Just ordered mine today. Can’t wait to try it out! Thanks for the review.
June 2nd, 2010 at 8:41 pm
Let us know what you think.
June 24th, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Hi Pablo
received mine last week, looks like they have made a couple of mods to it there are now two securing points at the foot end and the pole ends are slightly different, without the step and the eyelets that they fit into are a little more robust. They still come with pegs that weigh nearly as much as the bivvy itself!!!! Just sorting out a weekend to test it out. I see in one of your recent posts you were using your bivvy are you still pleased with the performance, do you have any more tips on using it and how do you get on with it during the night being all zipped in.
Thanks Pablo
lee
June 29th, 2010 at 10:50 am
Hi Lee. I am still pleased with it but I prefer hammocks. I hate being closed in so rarely zip all the way up. I would also prefer a sloping hammock netting as opposed to straight down. Other wise still a good bit of kit. Cheers for now. Pablo
July 22nd, 2010 at 10:42 am
Re the dimensions of the snugpak stratosphere: Just taken delivery of one and actually measuring the sizes
July 22nd, 2010 at 11:02 am
Sorry! here are the dimensions as I have measured them:
Width:84cms(33″)- base of front pole to front pole
Height:48.5cms(19″) – floor to centre of front pole
Length:235cms(92.5″)
The dimensions as written on the Snugpak label attached to the compression bag are:
230x95x15(sic)cms/90in x 37in x 24in
– a bit confusing! I bought this mail order on the assumption the height of the head area was 24″(61cms) and the width was 37″(94cms). I am new to bivvying so any advice gratefully and respectfully welcome. Martin
July 22nd, 2010 at 11:08 am
I am also new to computers!!! notify me of follow up comments via e-mail .
August 15th, 2010 at 8:07 pm
What would you do with a large rucksack??? If you were 5ft 10inchs would it fit in the botton?
August 15th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
Also wot do u think, Falcon or stratosphere? Although there’s also the highlander rapid force – http://www.survivalaids.com/order1.php?pg=413
August 16th, 2010 at 6:53 am
The Falcon is also good. Not much fifference. Read the other comments for a comparison.
August 18th, 2010 at 10:00 pm
Well, what can i say. Wish i’d bought the Rapid Force. I’ve just spent two nights in Yorkshire with my new Strat(for £100). First night it rained for about two hours. When i got up i noticed that the bottom of the bag (where i put enough items to try and raise the bag to clear my army down sleeping bag was soaked through.) Condensation was also a problem, which could easily have been solved using a hoop and vent at the bottom of the bag, allowing a free flow of air. I thought of this bag as a small tent to keep me dry when sleeping outdoors. No, a basha, or tarp is much more effective.
August 19th, 2010 at 11:40 pm
Nice review, i’ve had a stratosphere for a while and i’ve camped in the open and my garden where it has been exposed to the elements; the entire thing held up admirably to a decent amount of rain (even after it had been pitched on grass that was already soaking) and didn’t let a drop inside. There is, however, usually a small amount of moisture from condensation inside in the morning, this is probably my fault as i use a thicker sleeping bag than is neccessary in the british summer:P Even so there was never more than could easily be mopped up with my t-shirt without bothering me when i put it back on
A great piece of kit